Last night I
watched the last of “The Story of Science” documentaries, this one was titled Who Are We? and discussed (in part) B.F.Skinner’s work on behavioural psychology in the 1950s. Skinner did research
with pigeons that showed he could alter their behaviour very quickly using
rewards. He then theorised that humans learn in the same way, and that ALL of
our behaviour is learnt in response to our environment.
Personally this
sounds like nurture over nature; a theory I have personal reasons for not
agreeing with completely. I’m adopted and have very noticeable similarities to
my biological family. We don’t just look alike but we have the same mannerisms and ideologies despite the fact I only
met them when I was 21 years of age.
But even if
Skinner’s theory doesn’t explain 100% of our behaviour, it certainly has been
proven to work on humans; the Broken Window Theory implemented by Mayor
Guiliani during the 1990s is evidence of this (as discussed in The Tipping Point).
However
Skinner’s theory is only one argument against free will, determinism is another.
Determinism states that by the physical laws of cause and effect all actions
can be determined given a specific causal scenario; essentially you can predict
a result with certainty if you understand what causes that result.
Take that
theory to its ultimate end and you can imagine that every action in the
universe was put into play at the big bang; the physical laws just took over
and played out the determined result based on the causes that were present (after the
big bang). Then our very existence as well as every action we take is just
the playing out of subatomic particles1.
Whether you choose to believe in either determinism or Skinner’s theory may be irrelevant. Some
people believe humans invented God in order to make sense of the world, but
maybe we also invented the concept of free will to feel empowered and
important, like our choices matter.
Perhaps our
future generations will let go of the ego involved in free will – my choice, my
decision, my responsibility. Maybe being a part of the giant cosmic explosion2
is enough?
I know that
free will ‘seems right’; it’s hard to believe that we’re not in control of our
own movements and decisions, but not so long ago everyone believed that the
world was flat and the universe revolved around the earth – those ideas seemed right
at the time too.
I’d ask what
you think but your answer is already determined
1 "the playing out playing out of subatomic particles" - quote and concept from The Waking Life
2 "we're living through a giant cosmic explosion" - quote from The Story of Science
No comments:
Post a Comment